Disahkan oleh
penyelidikan
Bahan penanda aras HoloMotion membandingkan analisis pergerakan tanpa penanda dengan aliran kerja rujukan optik dalam keadaan terkawal, memberi pasukan klinikal, sukan dan penyelidikan pandangan prestasi yang telus.
Ringkasan
Kaedah pengesahan HoloMotion, status penanda aras dalaman, batasan dan sempadan bukti. Tiada artikel klinikal semakan rakan sejawat disenaraikan.
Dikemas kini Mei 2026Sejauh manakah ketepatan HoloMotion berbanding Vicon?
HoloMotion telah disahkan terhadap sistem optik Vicon, menunjukkan RMSE kurang daripada 2.5 darjah dalam kinematik satah sagital.
Perbandingan Bland-Altman
Bentuk Gelombang Kinematik
Validation method
- Capture the same movement sequence with HoloMotion and an optical reference system when benchmark equipment is available.
- Compare joint-angle time series and summary movement metrics under the same movement protocol.
- Review benchmark metrics alongside the documented movement protocol, reference workflow, and capture constraints.
- Document lighting, camera placement, clothing, occlusion, and subject-safety constraints as limitations.
Known limitations
- Accuracy depends on lighting, full-body visibility, camera placement, clothing contrast, and occlusion.
- Reported accuracy should be interpreted within the documented movement protocol, population, lighting, camera placement, and capture constraints.
- Clinical users should validate any workflow against their own protocol, population, and regulatory requirements.
- The system is designed for assessment support and research workflows; standalone diagnosis requires the appropriate regulatory status.
Soalan Lazim
Apakah butiran validasi yang dipaparkan HoloMotion?
Halaman ini memaparkan metrik benchmark, perbandingan workflow rujukan optik, kaedah dan batasan yang diketahui supaya workflow penilaian jelas.
Di mana pembaca perlu menyemak bukti terkini?
Gunakan halaman validasi ini untuk skop benchmark semasa, metrik pergerakan, kaedah, batasan dan pautan sumber yang dipaparkan.
Bagaimana pembeli harus mentafsir tuntutan validasi?
Ia perlu dibaca sebagai sokongan penilaian dan bukti benchmark teknikal, bukan pengganti pertimbangan klinikal bebas.