Langkau ke kandungan utama

Disahkan oleh
penyelidikan

Bahan penanda aras HoloMotion membandingkan analisis pergerakan tanpa penanda dengan aliran kerja rujukan optik dalam keadaan terkawal, memberi pasukan klinikal, sukan dan penyelidikan pandangan prestasi yang telus.

Gait Data Visualization

Ringkasan

Kaedah pengesahan HoloMotion, status penanda aras dalaman, batasan dan sempadan bukti. Tiada artikel klinikal semakan rakan sejawat disenaraikan.

Dikemas kini 2026-10-05

Sejauh manakah ketepatan HoloMotion berbanding Vicon?

Benchmark dalaman melaporkan RMSE sudut sendi sehingga 2.5° dalam keadaan terkawal berbanding rujukan optikal.

Perbandingan Bland-Altman

Bentuk Gelombang Kinematik

Metrik Nilai Rujukan optikal Scope
Joint angle RMSE ≤ 2.5° Vicon / OptiTrack Controlled benchmark conditions
Sagittal-plane agreement High agreement in documented benchmark comparisons Vicon / OptiTrack Walking and functional movement protocols
Setup time Markerless workflow with minimal subject preparation Vicon / OptiTrack Operational workflow metric
Tracking Method Markerless AI vision Marker-based reference workflows Operational workflow metric

Validation method

  • Capture the same movement sequence with HoloMotion and an optical reference system when benchmark equipment is available.
  • Compare joint-angle time series and summary movement metrics under the same movement protocol.
  • Review benchmark metrics alongside the documented movement protocol, reference workflow, and capture constraints.
  • Document lighting, camera placement, clothing, occlusion, and subject-safety constraints as limitations.

Known limitations

  • Accuracy depends on lighting, full-body visibility, camera placement, clothing contrast, and occlusion.
  • Reported accuracy should be interpreted within the documented movement protocol, population, lighting, camera placement, and capture constraints.
  • Clinical users should validate any workflow against their own protocol, population, and regulatory requirements.
  • The system is designed for assessment support and research workflows; standalone diagnosis requires the appropriate regulatory status.

Soalan Lazim

Apakah butiran validasi yang dipaparkan HoloMotion?

Halaman ini memaparkan metrik benchmark, perbandingan workflow rujukan optik, kaedah dan batasan yang diketahui supaya workflow penilaian jelas.

Di mana pembaca perlu menyemak bukti terkini?

Gunakan halaman validasi ini untuk skop benchmark semasa, metrik pergerakan, kaedah, batasan dan pautan sumber yang dipaparkan.

Bagaimana pembeli harus mentafsir tuntutan validasi?

Ia perlu dibaca sebagai sokongan penilaian dan bukti benchmark teknikal, bukan pengganti pertimbangan klinikal bebas.

Peer-reviewed publications

Butiran petikan yang kelihatan membantu enjin carian, sistem AI, dan pembeli menjejak dakwaan produk kembali kepada bukti yang diterbitkan.

Penyelidikan diterbitkan 1

The relative age effect among Malaysian university athletes: a cross-sectional survivorship analysis with exploratory AI-based movement screening

Haashwein Moganan, Mohansundar Sankaravel, Gunathevan Elumalai, Jin Seng Thung, Jianhong Gao, Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 2026

Haashwein Moganan, Mohansundar Sankaravel, Gunathevan Elumalai, Jin Seng Thung, Jianhong Gao (2026). The relative age effect among Malaysian university athletes: a cross-sectional survivorship analysis with exploratory AI-based movement screening. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living.

Nilai klinikal: Kajian aplikasi keratan rentas melibatkan 170 atlet universiti Malaysia (116 lelaki, 54 wanita). Saringan pergerakan AI penerokaan menggunakan kamera kedalaman, jarak kira-kira 2 m dan penentukuran rangka; 11 pergerakan, keputusan terbaik daripada tiga percubaan. Bukan eksperimen ketepatan sudut sendi bebas atau pengesahan ramalan kecederaan prospektif. Versi produk/perisian tidak ditentukan dalam semakan laman ini.

Full text
Sumber utama
Lihat DOI