Skip to main content

Technical Validation

HoloMotion benchmark material compares markerless motion analysis with optical reference workflows under controlled conditions, giving clinical, sports, and research teams a transparent view of motion-analysis performance.

Gait Data Visualization

At a glance

HoloMotion validation methods, benchmark workflow, limitations, and optical-reference comparison context for markerless motion analysis.

Updated May 2026
Home Solutions Technology FAQ Contact Us

How should HoloMotion accuracy claims be interpreted?

The public benchmark summary reports joint-angle RMSE up to 2.5 degrees under controlled benchmark conditions with optical reference workflows noted as the comparator.

Bland-Altman Comparison

Kinematic Waveforms

Metric Value Gold Standard Scope
Joint angle RMSE ≤ 2.5° Vicon / OptiTrack Controlled benchmark conditions
Sagittal-plane agreement High agreement in documented benchmark comparisons Vicon / OptiTrack Walking and functional movement protocols
Setup time Markerless workflow with minimal subject preparation Vicon / OptiTrack Operational workflow metric
Tracking Method Markerless AI vision Marker-based reference workflows Operational workflow metric

Validation method

  • Capture the same movement sequence with HoloMotion and an optical reference system when benchmark equipment is available.
  • Compare joint-angle time series and summary movement metrics under the same movement protocol.
  • Review benchmark metrics alongside the documented movement protocol, reference workflow, and capture constraints.
  • Document lighting, camera placement, clothing, occlusion, and subject-safety constraints as limitations.

Known limitations

  • Accuracy depends on lighting, full-body visibility, camera placement, clothing contrast, and occlusion.
  • Reported accuracy should be interpreted within the documented movement protocol, population, lighting, camera placement, and capture constraints.
  • Clinical users should validate any workflow against their own protocol, population, and regulatory requirements.
  • The system is designed for assessment support and research workflows; standalone diagnosis requires the appropriate regulatory status.

FAQ

What kind of validation detail does HoloMotion show?

The page presents benchmark metrics, optical-reference workflow comparisons, methods, and known limitations so readers can evaluate the assessment workflow clearly.

Where should readers check the latest evidence details?

Use this validation page for current benchmark scope, reported movement metrics, methods, limitations, and source links that are explicitly shown.

How should buyers interpret validation claims?

Claims should be read as assessment-support and technical benchmark evidence, not as a substitute for independent clinical judgment.